Doug's away for a bit, leaving me with keys to the Yugo. Whee!
This is some sort of holy week -- but what week isn't? -- so let me continue with my occasional posts about the joy of sects. This time, the Baptists.
The first World Baptist Congress was held in London in 1905, leading to the formation of the World Baptist Alliance. Doctrinally, Baptists have traditionally been against hierarchy -- the current Southern Baptist Convention would be like a steel rasp on Roger Williams' teeth -- and so the Congress met in a spirit of egalitarian fellowship. The next convention was held in 1911, in Philadelphia; the third, in Stockholm in 1923; the fourth, in Toronto in 1928.
The fifth was held in Berlin. August 4th through August 10th, 1934. A vintage season. Two days after the death of President Hindenberg, two weeks after the assassination of Austrian chancellor Dollfuss, and a little over a month after the bloody purge of the SA, the Night of the Long Knives.
Needless to say, reactions to the new Germany were mixed among the American attendees. Former Southern Baptist Convention president George W. Truett, who conducted camp meetings for cowboys in west Texas every summer for nearly forty years, "introduced a hotly debated peace resolution which urged governments to surrender whatever national sovereignty necessary to establish an international authority for peace in the world." On the other hand, the Southern Baptist Convention's then-current president, pioneer radio preacher Monroe Elmon Dodd of Louisiana, had a different take:
Since the war some 200,000 Jews from Russia and other Eastern places had come into Germany. Most of these were Communist agitators against the government... [While Jews] were not to be blamed for the intelligence and strength, so characteristic of their race, which put them forward, [they used their abilities] for self-aggrandizement to the injury of the German people.And a Boston Baptist was pleased:
It was a great relief to be in a country where salacious sex literature cannot be sold; where putrid motion pictures and gangster films cannot be shown. The new Germany has burned great masses of corrupting books and magazines along with its bonfires of Jewish and communistic libraries.
(Quotes taken from William Loyd Allen's fascinating 1982 article, "How Baptists Assessed Hitler", found here.)
One man in particular at the Congress seems to have been transformed by his experiences in Germany. It might be possible to catch a glimpse of him filtered through that week's Time magazine:
Treasuring a written promise of freedom of speech from Dr. Paul Joseph Goebbels, the Baptists talked about nationalism, war & peace, separation of Church & State. A U. S. Negro heading a delegation of 30 black Baptists was all primed to present a resolution on racial equality.In attendance was the Reverend Michael King of Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, Georgia... known after his return as Martin Luther King, Sr. Posted by coyu at April 4, 2007 10:57 PM
You know, I didn't even get past the date before bursting out in horrible, malevolent, Disney villain laughter.
Anyway, any religious group established for the sake of defending slavery that's never reconciled itself, well, it deserves a good laughing.
That said, what did Martin Luther King, Sr. take away from the experience?
Posted by: Luke at April 5, 2007 07:57 AMThanks for this, damn interesting.
Posted by: RS at April 5, 2007 11:20 AMLuke, only one part of the Baptist Church, viz., the Southern Baptist Convention, was formed to preserve slavery. IIRC, by the time of the event in question, the SBC was not the world-striding colossus that it is today at the time of the conference. OTOH, it says something rather disturbing that the most dogmatically text-based of fundamentalists have a disturbing tendency to "strain at a gnat and swallow a camel" when it comes to issues of morality.
Actually, as long as you're here, Luke, does that *other* dogmatic monotheistic religion have a like tendency among the it's more rigid exegetes?
Posted by: Andrew R. at April 5, 2007 04:52 PMcorrected the time stamp to reflect NYC time of posting. usually I don't bother, but.
Posted by: Carlos at April 5, 2007 05:49 PMAndrew:
"OTOH, it says something rather disturbing that the most dogmatically text-based of fundamentalists have a disturbing tendency to "strain at a gnat and swallow a camel" when it comes to issues of morality."
Voltaire's wolves, from A Treatise on Tolerance, come to mind.
Posted by: Randy McDonald at April 5, 2007 09:00 PMThis is why I love history. Always some facinating connections that you'd never guess at.
Thanks for bringint this interest bit up,
Mike
Andrew,
I know the whole dark arc of the SBC--it behooves me to know, being who I am. I get glib about people who want their hands in my business. Not that I don't understand them, but, well, if I'm a morally the same as a kleptomaniac/alcoholic, then they're all as bad as the pro-slavery branch. Until they get it together.
As for other religions with exegete issues: Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhists, and Islam. Seriously, it's a feature, not a bug, of good monotheism that your faith produces nutballs that want to scour the earth in some way or other.
And I know what you're getting at; my thesis has such choice lines as "The Hanbali qadis alarmingly abandoned their loyalty to dispensing the law with their pens, and instead, made common cause with their co-religionists on the streets of Baghdad, tearing up cobblestones, attacking and murdering Hanafis, Heshamites, and Shi'a. They led attacks on the 'Cathedral Mosques' of Al-Kharkh, burned down Jewish banks and ransacked the Christian book-selling district. Thereafter, they retired to their salon, where they discussed the works of Aristotle and enjoyed readings of 'The Book of Gifts and Rarities' and 'The Epistle of the Singing Slave-Girl.'"
Classy, eh?
Posted by: Luke at April 6, 2007 05:50 AM