First, an observation: sometimes the seemingly random order which one reads books can reveal connections that would have otherwise gone unnoticed. With that in mind, here's James Ellroy, author of the superlative crime novel L.A. Confidential:
I read Dashiell Hammett at the downtown library. I read Ross Macdonald by flashlight in the parks. I read meretricious crime writers all over L.A. I read Jolting Joe Wambaugh in jail and out.The New Centurions/The Blue Knight/The Onion Field/The Choirboys -- visionary work by a cop. L.A. revised. Authoritarianism dissected. Authority sanely lauded over chaos. A counter-counterculture view of 1960 up. Absurdism sans leftist drill. A horrible compassion and indictment of moral default.
Wambaugh burned through me. Wambaugh made me dredge abstractions and spin epigrams. Wambaugh made me think what it all meant.
Wambaugh sang me a swan song. Wambaugh changed me forever. Here's how I know that:
He made me ashamed of my life.
As a young man Ellroy was, um. Best let him describe it:
The blur heightened. School became a nonendurable drag. I was seventeen. I was white. "Free" would make it the trifecta. I stepped up my Nazi antics. I got suspended from class for a week. My dad started calling me "you kraut c[family blog]r." I painted swastikas the dog's dish. My dad wore a Jewish beanie to torment me.I returned to school. I juiced the escape process. The Folk Song Club met. I regaled and disrupted with a pro-Nazi tune and a chorus of the "Horst Wessel Lied."
They expelled me. It was midweek in mid-March of 1965. I walked south on Fairfax. I've got the details memorized.
Ellroy went downhill from there. "I was Don DeLillo's Lee Harvey Oswald writ pit-faced and tall." He's not kidding.
I recently read Theodore Judson's Fitzpatrick's War, and have been pushing it on some (not all) of my science fiction reading friends. It's military science fiction, and uses nearly every single cliche of that subgenre adroitly; but I believe it was written to make one ashamed of military science fiction. Judson follows the consequences of every cliche to their natural, evil conclusion, and does it in a nearly perfect deadpan. It's a tour de force.
Which cliches did Judson use? I assembled a partial list elsewhere:
... devices that prevent electricity from being used, feudalism, dirigibles, the Alexander legend, Eurabia, the cult of 'hard men', wog-stomping, gook-killing, the John Campbell-Leo Strauss types who Know Better, the flip dismissal of all the social sciences except History, and even the freaking Union Jack.
And I shouldn't forget Judson's pisstakes on Joseph Campbell and his philosophy, or on the sexually aggressive annoying always-right red-headed woman (usually associated with Robert Heinlein, but hardly unique to him).
Here's a quote from a character in Fitzpatrick's War who Knows Better:
"It says in the Bible, Sir Robert, 'I shall bring on you everlasting disgrace and everlasting shame which will never be forgotten.' ... Tell me, do you believe there is such a thing as everlasting shame?"
Everlasting shame? For non-genre readers, y'all should know that the rehabilitation of the SS is perfectly acceptable within the military science fiction genre. To an outside observer, however, the genre might as well be in a militia compound somewhere... which is one of Judson's points.
Judson is a solid writer. I've just read his first novel, Tom Wedderburn's Life, which strikes many of the same notes of character, but in a twentieth-century Wyoming setting. (D and C, I'm sending it to Yerevan in the next box. You'll like.) It's very strong, and I really wonder why he had to publish it the way he did.
(Actually, I don't wonder too much; I've heard enough stories from friends in publishing to see how good books can fall through the cracks, even without dysfunctional editors or agents.)
My hope is, Judson will be to someone that Wambaugh was to Ellroy. Some poor sod who reads nothing but Extruded MilSF Product, perhaps. Perhaps that's Judson's hope too.
Let me conclude with Ellroy's benediction:
I changed my life. I credit Almighty God with the save. [he's not kidding. -- CY] I disowned profligacy. I sought righteousness. I swooned to write books. Literature is a deep calling. I knew it at the depth of my shame.Posted by coyu at April 20, 2006 03:10 AMIt's been good -- and it's nowhere near over. Now I learn from my words on the page. I dig the mystical aspect. My weird shit is out in the spiritus mundi -- particles popping in air.
There's a kid or some kids somehwere. I'll never know them. They're particle-puzzle-cubing right now. They might be mini-misanthropes from Moosefart, Montana. They might be demi-dystopians from Dogdick, Delaware. They dig my demonic dramas. The metaphysic maims them. They grasp at the gravity. They'll duke it out with their demons. They'll serve up a surfeit of survival skills. They won't be chronologically crucified.
They'll shore up my shit. They'll radically revise it. They'll pass it along.
I'm halfway through _Fitzpatrick's War_ now. I'm impressed that he's come up with a backstory even sillier than most MilSF books, which takes a bit of doing. I suppose that's the whole point.
Posted by: Gareth Wilson at April 20, 2006 08:21 AMTsk. Anyone with a real opinion?
Posted by: Carlos at April 20, 2006 08:57 AMTo clarify, I _like_ Fitzpatrick's War, at least so far, and I understand why the backstory is so silly. I have to thank you and Doug for recommending it - from the outside it looks like one of the duller examples of its satirical targets and I wouldn't have picked it up without a heads-up.
Posted by: Gareth Wilson at April 20, 2006 11:52 AMCarlos -- your list of plot elements suggests that Judson is specifically out to parody Stirling as well as the genre in general -- is that what you meant? Sounds like a fun read. _Bill the Galactic Hero_ by Harrison was an attempt to do this to Heinlein juveniles, which I thought was somewhat funny but too silly (like much of Harrison's work) to be effective at what you're suggesting. _Star Smashers of the Galaxy Rangers_ was a little better at exposing some of the subtexts in Doc Smith and Campbell.
Thanks for the tip -- I will look for the book.
More of an extrapolation of the underlying political philosophy common to his crowd, I think. A few direct bits of parody, but Judson saves the big ammo for more important targets.
Incidentally, Fitzpatrick's War came out at the same time as that 'serious' [sic] no-electricity/genocide/boy's-own-adventure novel, and was almost certainly written beforehand.
(The having-no-electricity-will-cleanse-civilization-of-its-peacenik-dross-and-make-it-manly-again premise is part of the stock in trade of Bad Science Fictional Ideas. I believe Pournelle included the first story of that kind in one of his "I WANT A WAR DAMMIT" anthologies, perhaps next to a David Horowitz editorial.)
It's a clever hunter who anticipates his prey so well.
Posted by: Carlos at April 20, 2006 05:00 PMSounds interesting. I'll be sure to pick it up.
Posted by: Bernard Guerrero at April 20, 2006 05:34 PMYou know, I feel I should be pushing Wambaugh and Ellroy more. They're solid and worth your time.
Is this a case of genres not mixing, in the same way there aren't any Alan Furst novels set In Spaaaace? (While there are hundreds of SF novels in first-person smartass.)
Posted by: Carlos at April 20, 2006 06:46 PMfrom the Amazon link:
BETTER TOGETHER
Buy this book with Dies the Fire by S. M. Stirling today!
Total List Price: $31.94
Buy Together Today: $23.56
Amazon would never steer us wrong would they?
Posted by: Francis Burdett at April 21, 2006 06:13 AMLooks like Amazon is trying to get rid of their hardcovers. Incidentally, you should read the reviews of the latter. They're truly hilarious. When even Cat Piss Man tells you that you're being a little too over-the-top for his tastes, you've got a problem.
Posted by: Carlos at April 21, 2006 04:44 PMFPSA might be one of those techniques that is _very_ easy to copy, like Turtledove's cast of zillions book structure.
I may post something about the lack of Furstian SF on my LJ.
Posted by: James Nicoll at April 21, 2006 05:03 PMI'd enjoy reading that.
Posted by: Carlos at April 21, 2006 07:19 PMFor anyone who's interested I have a blog and every once in a while I post my book notes to it. My notes for Fitzpatrick's War can be found at:
http://mikesbooknotes.blogspot.com/2006/04/fitzpatricks-war-by-theodore-judson.html
[moderator's note: a list of S.M. Stirling's human shortcomings would be too long to insert here, but setting aside his pro-genocide and historical denialist positions, the stalking, and the lack of manners, he's also not a very good writer.]
Folks, to inject a note of realism, out here in the Real World (tm), Ted Judson and I are friendly correspondents and like each other's work -- I'm going to be blurbing his next book, "The Martian General's Daughter".
(Which I'm currently reading in manuscript and which is excellent, btw. I do like a writer who knows his classical history.)
And alas, I have to tell you that you've all gotten "Fitzpatrick's War" very, very wrong, at least as far as the author's intentions are concerned.
Sometimes the reader and the text engage in a fruitful dialogue. And sometimes it's more in the nature of the reader having a monologue with himself, with results that can leave the author at a loss.
Steve Brust tells me that he once met a fan who burbled away for some time about the way "Brokedown Palace", and I quote, "stuck it to the Jews".
Which, as he said, was extremely odd, since a) Brust is a Jewish Marxist and b) in ethnic terms there's nobody in the book but pseudo-Magyars and aliens.
"Many are the wonders, but none more wonderful than man".
Posted by: S.M. Stirling at November 27, 2006 06:33 AM