Like all the men of Babylon, I have been proconsul; like all, I have been a slave. I have known omnipotence, ignominy, imprisonment. Look here - my right hand has no index finger. -- Jorge Luis Borges, The Lottery of Babylon
Unhappy the land that needs heroes. -- Bertold Brecht
We were in the taxi, driving along, when suddenly the taxi driver lunged forward and stabbed the radio with a stiff index finger. The news, which had been murmuring along, suddenly boomed and blared, filling the taxi with harsh Albanian: President Rugova was dead.
"Bah!" said the taxi driver.
There was silence for a few moments. Solemn music began to play. The driver turned the radio back down.
I couldn't resist. "Bah?" I said.
"I didn't like him."
Certainly not everyone liked Ibrahim Rugova. He wasn't all that likable. He was, by all accounts, a remarkably boring man in person. And in his political life, he was stubbornly, utterly fixated on just two ideas: that Kosovo should be independent, and that this should be accomplished by nonviolent means.
Half right.
There are plenty of pocket biographies of Rugova on the web; I don't feel a need to add to them. If you're interested in the Balkans, you probably know all about him already: the pacifism, the rock collection, the scarf.
There are a couple of things, though...
Rugova was accidental. "He was a kind of loser who sat in the corner drinking too much coffee." He was the head of the Kosovo Writers' Union, for goodness' sake. Even in Kosovo, even in Kosovo under Communism -- when people took things like writers' unions sort of half seriously -- this was a little ridiculous.
Rugova got the job because the best candidate didn't want it, and none of the other candidates could tolerate each other. But nobody was threatened by Rugova. His very lack of charisma propelled him to the fore.
Rugova was stubborn, sometimes to the point of willful blindness. Clear into the summer of 1998 -- months after the KLA had become a broad-based popular movement -- he was insisting that there was no KLA, that it was all a Serbian plot to justify a crackdown. To admit otherwise was to admit that nonviolence had failed, and he was not going to do that.
On the other hand, that same stubbornness let him make a political comeback that once seemed completely impossible.
When the NATO bombing started in March 1999, Rugova disappeared for a day or two. Then he popped up in Belgrade, on Serbian television, shaking hands with Milosevic and calling for a peaceful solution. I remember watching that and thinking, what the hell. We're starting a war for this guy, and he's sitting in a chair chatting casually with Slobo?
Now imagine the feelings of most Albanians. Hundreds of thousands of Kosovars were driven from their homes that March and April by Milosevic's Operation Horseshoe. My taxi driver was one of them. He and his wife waited on a narrow mountain road for eight days. They had a three-month-old baby girl. There were tens of thousands of people on the road, trying to get into Macedonia. It was cold at night, and there wasn't enough food or water, but that wasn't the worst. The worst was not knowing if the Serbs would come at night to kill them.
No, he didn't like Rugova.
The Belgrade episode remains mysterious. Was Rugova under duress? Or was he sincerely trying to talk peace, somehow imagining he could convince Milosevic to back down? Rugova later claimed that his family had been threatened, but he was oddly reticent about the details.
And his subsequent behavior didn't help. He flew to Italy, then sat out the war there, not returning until well after the fighting had stopped.
When he did, he found himself... well, not quite a pariah, but far fallen from his previous status. Oh, he still had supporters. Rugova, that dull and difficult man, turned out to have a curious ability to inspire fanatical devotion. But in late 1999 and 2000 they were painfully few. Most Kosovars viewed him with some mixture of disillusionment, contempt, even hate. The KLA, the heroic guerrillas who had fought for Kosovo's freedom, were the province's new leaders. Rugova was finished.
Except not. A year passed, and another, and the KLA turned out not to be so heroic after all. Yes, they had fought bravely. But they knew nothing about actually governing. Months after the end of the war, there was no electricity, no running water, no heat in the winter. Some KLA members seemed to be getting rich, but the rest of the province's population was worse off than ever. There were rumors of drug smuggling, of KLA "officers" forming criminal gangs to traffic around the region in heroin, arms, prostitutes, stolen cars. Certainly there was open traffic in loot and apartments taken from the Serbs; and certainly many of the KLA guerrillas conducted themselves with a great deal of swagger. And the former comrades seemed to spend more energy bickering with each other than in working together for Kosovo.
Slowly people came back to Rugova. He hadn't changed. He had been living quietly, doing a little writing, working on his rock collection. People came to think: Rugova might be stubborn, and sometimes stubbornly wrong, but he was what he was. You knew where you stood. Rugova's party, the LDK, won an unexpected victory in Kosovo's first free elections in late 2000; and in 2002, Rugova was appointed Kosovo's President, this time for real.
Rugova is worth a long look, if only because determined pacifists in positions of real power are so rare. Rare anywhere, and doubly so in the Balkans.
But me... I don't have anything more to say about Ibrahim Rugova today.
Posted by douglas at January 31, 2006 06:33 PMalso worth a look if only for the limited number of literary theorists who have ever been heads of state. [Who else?]
How many heads of state or government have even ever heard of Roland Barthes much less studied under him?
Would it be correct to characterize Rugova as one of the last old school classical east block dissident-intellectuals turned politician? Most of those guys had their day in the early 1990s, Rugova was a decade behind...
Posted by: Oskar L. at February 2, 2006 12:47 AMWould it be correct to characterize Rugova as one of the last old school classical east block dissident-intellectuals turned politician?
Mm, not really. There are similarities, sure... but I wouldn't call Rugova a dissident. Up until 1989 he was a good Party member, without any record of dissidence or troublemaking.
Yugoslavia rotated the dissidents vs. Communists axis 90 degrees. Some of the nastiest people were former dissidents; some of the most admirable were former Communists.
This tended to confuse Westerners coming to it for the first time. To some extent, it still does.
Doug M.
Doug,
I hadn't though about how the dissident-communist party member thing was a bit different in the former Yugoslavia. Interesting.
By the way, did Rugova have any views on the future of the Serbs in Kosovo or on the attacks on them after 1999?
Rugova was generally silent on the topic of the Serbs. Or rather, he offered vague generalities about minority rights without any real teeth to them. He can be -- should be -- criticized for this. But then, given the relations between Serbs and Albanians, it's questionable how much room for maneuver he had.
IDK what he said after the 2004 riots, but I don't think it was particularly constructive.
Doug M.
FB, there's Havel of course. Then Hungary's Arpad Göncz. Vytautus Landsbergis (Lithuania) was, I think, a musicologist, which is at least related. Lennart Meri (Estonia) was an author and translator. Someone who knows Africa and South America better than I will have to take up the baton for those regions.
Posted by: Doug (another) at February 6, 2006 01:58 PM