Because it wouldn't be Halfway Down the Danube without the occasional incomprehensible post about American football (gridiron) from the guy with the coffee cup icon, now, would it?
It's spring in the US! which also means it's draft season for professional American football! Some explanation might be required for non-US sports enthusiasts.
Unlike professional soccer (futbol, calcio, whatever) US professional gridiron doesn't relegate or promote teams based on rank. In fact, there's an involved structure to keep the level of play between teams as even as possible. Part of this is done monetarily: the National Football League has instituted rules to limit the amount of money each team can spend on players (which the San Francisco 49ers shamefully abused during their years of glory, but I digress). And it works. It turns out that in a cross-country comparison of sports leagues, the NFL has the lowest correlation between money spent and performance, while professional Italian soccer has the highest.
US gridiron also balances team competition via the draft. Based on reverse standings, the worst team in the NFL has first pick of hot eligible players from (usually) university teams. The second worst, the next pick. And so on. (The US uses its university gridiron teams as a 'farm' system for its professional league. The upshot of this has been to democratize the universities, rather than to make gridiron more elite. It's a little peculiar.)
My own home team, the Green Bay Packers, made it to the playoffs last year, and so had a late pick in the draft for the first round. Weirdly enough, one of this year's hottest quarterbacks (roughly analogous to team captain; for two sports with the same roots, gridiron and soccer positions have diverged wildly) hadn't yet been chosen. While Green Bay already has a legendary quarterback named Brett Favre, truly one of the greatest in the game -- [far] better than Beckham is to soccer, in my opinion -- he's slightly older than I am, and will probably retire after this season. And so the Packers snapped up Aaron Rodgers as pick number 24. Not anyone's expected outcome.
Anyway, during the draft, potential players are subjected to all sorts of tests. Some of them are more rigorous than others. Carrie of Bad Mama sent me this link on testing player intelligence. (And you can try the test yourself!) This was my favorite part:
Some teams consider the test results critical. Others say they dismiss the results, except for players who score at the extremes. What's an extreme? Well, former Bengals punter and Harvard grad Pat McInally scored a perfect 50 -- the only NFL player known to do so -- while at least one player, it is rumored, scored a 1.
(Internal link mine.)
Before anyone begins to post about how American football is so incredibly boring (and I retaliate about the whiny, tedious nature of socker, which is an alien, imperialist transplant to most of the world anyway), let us agree that they fill different niches and satisfy different itches. In my opinion, basketball and baseball fill the roles in the US as soccer does elsewhere, while the gridiron is more of a cyborg sport, like NASCAR, Formula One, the Tour de France, mountaineering, weightlifting, and the Russian space program. I mean, what other sport looks for a fast 175-kg man, who will assuredly need corrective surgeries throughout his career?
(In related news, it looks like Monday Night Football is to be no more. And so passes an American TV tradition. Dennis Miller was probably the lethal wound, but then John Madden sat on it. Ah well.)
Posted by coyu at April 24, 2005 07:31 PMGeez, I really suck at standardized tests but even I had them all down in some minutes.
That's sad.
And no. Soccer players ain't intelligent either. (But the game is. Hah!)
Just kidding.
Posted by: claudia at April 24, 2005 08:53 PMWell, Beckham is no more than a marketing doll and an average player in football. It ain't too hard to be better than him, really.
Posted by: Andrei at April 24, 2005 10:40 PMYeah, Andrei, I know. (S/o/r/t/ /o/f/ /l/i/k/e/ /T/o/m/ /B/r/a/d/y./) But I liked the alliteration and allusion of "better than Beckham" -- who is the only soccer player in the US with even vague general name recognition, and that probably because of his wife.
Posted by: Carlos at April 24, 2005 10:54 PM_Male_ soccer player, I should say.
Posted by: Carlos at April 24, 2005 10:56 PMSo, what possible consequences for the Packers?
(You haven't ever done a post explaining the Packers to our Euro-friends. Have you?)
Doug M.
B/r/a/d/y?
Hmm three Super Bowl victories in four years- must then all be on Bill Belichick's shoulders.
Speaking of Rodgers-
Playing for Cal (or in the entire PAC-10 for that matter) from my Eastern Standard Time vantage point he might as well have been playing in Siberia but in looking him up-
Posted by: Sir Francis Burdett at April 27, 2005 11:13 PM....but in looking him up-
Only a year and a half experience as a Division-I starter?
Going pro a year early?
Only just turned 21 in December?
6'1" 223
He will have only a year on the bench will he be ready at age 22?
He is kinda cute though www.sfgate.com/c/pictures/2005/01/04/sp_aaron_rodgers.jpg
Frankie, I think B/r/a/d/y/ is solidly in the middle of the first rank of current quarterbacks. And I think Belicheck is an excellent coach with an excellent staff. (Don't get me started on the Packers' coaching deficiencies.)
The gridiron does that sometimes. Favre only has one championship trophy. Dan Marino, none. Barry Sanders, none. Peyton Manning will likely never win a Superbowl, and by some he's considered the best QB out there. (I think they've been mixing grain and grape myself, but it is a defensible opinion.)
As for Rodgers, we will see.
Posted by: Carlos at April 27, 2005 11:34 PM