When I was in the US over New Year's, I picked up some books. I would have liked to pick up more, but there was only so much room in the suitcase. (I pulled a muscle as it was.)
Since the kids are (cross fingers!) not sick any more, I've had a little time for reading. Last night I managed to finish Quicksilver, by Neal Stephenson.
This is a... really good book, though it may not be to everyone's taste. It's a historical novel about the early days of the Scientific Revolution, from about 1660 to 1688. It's eight hundred pages long. There are quite a lot of digressions... most of them, I think, fascinating. The main characters are fictional, but Newton, Hooke, Leibniz, King Charles II of England and Louis XIV of France all play major roles.
And it's really funny, though some of the humor is rather dry, and some is very black indeed.
I can't do this book justice in a blog post, but if you like historical novels, or just want a really long book that's intellectually challenging but also entertaining and fun, check this out.
Then: I'm about half way through Paris 1919, by Margaret MacMillan, and I'm liking it a lot. It's a fairly straightforward history book about the Paris Peace Conference after the First World War, which led to the Treaty of Versailles. Since the book is only 450 pages or so, it has to skim a little (it's a huge topic), but it manages to cover most of the important points with verve and an eye for the telling detail.
There's a complete chapter on Romania, by the way -- a short one, but well worth a look. The author clearly has a very low opinion of Ion Bratianu, the Romanian Prime Minister; she has damning quotes about him from various delegates ("Bratianu is a bearded woman, a forceful humbug, a Bucharest intellectual, a most unpleasing man... He makes elaborate verbal jokes, imagining them to be Parisian.") There's a particularly pithy one from Romania's Queen Marie: "A tiresome, sticky and tedious individual."
Marie was entitled to a cheap shot or two; if anyone made sure of Romania's gains in 1919, it was her. She charmed Lloyd George and Clemenceau (though she alienated the straitlaced Woodrow Wilson by talking about love, and then arriving half an hour late to lunch), provided a welcome distraction to bored reporters, and overall made a much more positive impression than the histrionic Bratianu.
One detail that seems to catch every reader's eye: the author asserts that, before the First World War, officers in the Romanian Army were quite fond of wearing makeup. Since the rest of the book seems pretty well researched, I'm willing to consider this, but I'd like to see some collaboration before accepting it. I've read one book on Romania in the First World War, and this quirk was not mentioned; on the other hand, it was a book of political and military history, and didn't much discuss issues of culture or, um, fashion.
Anyhow. There are also individual chapters for Bulgaria, Yugoslavia, Czecheslovakia, Poland, and the Arab Middle East, among others. This is an interesting way to organize the material... and it also makes it a very convenient read for parents with small children, who may only have a few minutes here and there!
_Paris 1919_ is a very good book, and I recommend it to anyone who enjoys history.
Next up: _The Uprising_ ("Rascoala") by Liviu Rebreanu. I'm trying to catch up on my Romanian reading...
Posted by douglas at January 15, 2004 09:42 PM | TrackBackOne detail that seems to catch every reader's eye: the author asserts that, before the First World War, officers in the Romanian Army were quite fond of wearing makeup.
Well, it's a very eye-catching detail.
C.
Posted by: Carlos at January 16, 2004 12:02 AMYes, that's a good one! :} I wonder if officers in any other armies used to... mmm... do that.
Posted by: kit at January 16, 2004 01:24 AMRe Quicksilver:
I see that some people elsewhere -- one of the minor circles of Hell we both visit, in scorn and pity -- complain that Quicksilver has no plot... and that Cryptonomicon, Snow Crash, The Diamond Age *do*!
I think what is happening is that these hapless readers don't feel themselves connected to the grand meta-narrative in which Quicksilver is embedded -- the birth of the Scientific Revolution and the modern mind -- in the same way they felt connected to the trendy crypto nano hacko meta-narrative of C, SC, TDA.
Because, in terms of plot, Cryptonomicon is a vastly overblown book about a treasure hunt, The Diamond Age a deeply padded story about a girl's coming of age, and Snow Crash was, well, just a mess.
It's an odd complaint.
C.
Posted by: Carlos at January 16, 2004 09:41 AMRe makeup:
The detail seems to have been taken from Princess Anne-Marie Callimachi's memoirs, _Yesterday was Mine_. Haven't found it yet, but I did find this excerpt from that work on Marie:
"Her love affairs and caprices were never considered a grievance by the people. On the contrary, I believe the Roumanians, with their natural lack of morality, felt relieved at not having a saint for their Queen."
[emphasis added]
Callimachi also seems to have translated Colette into English.
C.
Posted by: Carlos at January 16, 2004 09:31 PM