December 10, 2003

A Few Words About Romania's Economy

fpi_glasses.jpg Right now Romania's economy is doing OK. Yes, there are lots of problems, some of them very serious, but (with one exception) the "macroeconomic fundamentals" look pretty good.

Unemployment has been falling for the last couple of years. Today it is around 7.5%, which seems high to Americans but is pretty good for Europe. (Yes, that's the official statistic, and yes, the real figure is almost certainly higher. But it's clear that unemployment has been falling for a while now as the economy expands.)

Inflation is running around 15 percent per year, which is high but much much lower than it was; it was 45 percent just a few years ago. The currency is pretty stable. The banking sector, after a lot of difficulties, now seems to be in good shape, and there's a lending boom. Foreign direct investment is rising, albeit from a very low base. The government's budget deficit is big but at least it's not growing any more. Overall, the economy is growing between 4% and 5% per year, and has been for almost three years now.

Mind, Romanian wages have not risen along with growth. The average real wage, adjusted for inflation, only rose by about 1.6% in 2003. Optimists say this is because Romanian productivity is going up, so of course output is rising faster than wages. Pessimists say that Romanian workers, especially in the public sector, will demand big wage increases soon, and that this will result in wage-price inflation. But that's a story for another time; and at least real wages are rising, which is not true everywhere in this region.

So, good news, right? Well, maybe. There are two areas of concern.

1) There are probably a lot of "structural problems" lying in wait for Romania. Like reefs below the placid surface of a lagoon, these are problems that may rip the bottom out of Romania's economy.

To name just a few, Romania has painfully high taxes; a bloated and inefficient public sector that still controls nearly half of the country's economy; and a bad reputation for corruption. None of these have crippled growth so far, but they could all act to put a sudden brake on it.

I may talk about these in more detail some other time. For now, let's talk about the other big problem. Here comes some discussion of economics, which will certainly be hard for some readers and ridiculously oversimplified for others. I'd rather err on the side of simplicity, though. (Beat me up in the comments section if you must.)

2) I said there was one exception. There's one macroeconomic indicator that's suddenly going in a worrying direction, and that's the current account deficit. In non-economist language, that means Romanians are importing a lot more than they are exporting. This deficit has been large for a while, but in the last few months it has been growing explosively. It was expected to be about 4.8% of gross domestic product in 2003, but it looks like it will be more like 6.5%.

There are several reasons for this. One is that Romania's economy is growing, so businesses are importing a lot of machines and other tools for doing business. Another is that Romanians are buying a lot of foreign consumer goods. A third is that the harvest this year was very bad, so Romania must import a lot of food.

Okay, so what does this mean? Well, it means that eventually the Romanian currency, the leu will have to drop in value. After all, people don't want lei (to buy Romanian goods) as much as they want euros or dollars (to buy everything else). So there'll be downward pressure on the leu. In fact, there is already downward pressure on the leu.

This gives the Romanian government two choices, neither of them good.

1) It can allow the leu to fall. But this will make foreign goods more expensive, so it will make Romanians feel poorer. This is politically dangerous, especially in an election year. Oh, and there's also the risk of a panic if the leu falls too much, too fast.

2) It can defend the leu. For instance, it can raise interest rates. If interest rates on lei-denominated investments are higher, then people will change euros and dollars into lei to buy them.

Unfortunately, raising interest rates is a good way to stop growth. Interest rates in Romania are already pretty high. (Those figures include inflation, so you need to subtract ten or fifteen percent. Still.) Raising interest rates further means fewer businesses borrowing money, so less investment, so less growth.

Right now the government is sort of wiggling around trying to find another way. For instance, working on the assumption that consumer spending is the problem, they are considering raising excise (import) taxes on certain "luxury" goods, and also trying to make consumer credit more difficult to obtain.

This is actually not a bad idea -- assuming they have identified the problem correctly. If they can gently slow consumer spending, and the trade deficit self-corrects in the next six months or so, then perhaps they can escape without either a big interest rate hike or a big drop in the leu.

(Okay, this is my first try at a "serious" post here, and I don't know if our readers find this sort of thing interesting at all. So comments, even critical ones, are very welcome.)

Posted by douglas at December 10, 2003 10:09 AM
Comments

Hi. i have some comments :)
1. about the unemployment.. well.. that number is probably their DREAM, because the number of people who do not have a job (with proper taxex paid I mean) is at least 3-4 times bigger.

2. Imports are high and I think will be higher with every month and with every factory they CLOSE. I am not expert in economy (probably you are) but this is my opinion. If you close a factory you have to import. our government closed LOTS of factories.. so now we do import. If somebody builds a good factory, the products are exported (is this a good thing? - please explain).

I am very interested to understand what is going on with Romanian economy, and your messages helps a lot! Thanks :)
Have a nice day!
Anca

Posted by: Anca & Misha at December 10, 2003 05:00 PM

>I don't know if our readers find this sort
>of thing interesting at all.

This reader does. But I find the posts about
the kids interesting too. Not helpful, I'm sure.

I seem to recall a story from your experiences in Saipan about that gov't raising taxes on imported liquor that I wouldn't mind hearing again.

Posted by: Pouncer at December 10, 2003 05:20 PM

I'm looking at the CIA Factbook on Romania's economy. I know that this source definitely has failings--for one, the demographic statistics on the South Caucasus states and Moldova don't reflect the massive post-Soviet emigration from those countries--but it seems likely to provide rough statistics. Romania's service sector seems to be rather underdeveloped, particularly from the point of view of employment; agriculture, on the other hand, is vastly overmanned, even compared to Poland.

Where will jobs and growth come from?

Posted by: Randy McDonald at December 10, 2003 06:14 PM

I'll admit to finding "serious" posts interesting. At the moment, I'm getting more of my news from friends' blogs and livejournals than from newspapers, as it's more interesting to check up on people I know than try to plow through the paper.

Posted by: Ase at December 11, 2003 01:57 AM

This sounds rather familiar.

Current account deficit => inflows to the capital account. (Romanians are paying for the extra stuff with money coming in from other nations.)

You know what I am thinking, of course.

Anyway, it strikes me that raising excise taxes would be politically unpopular, for the same reason as letting the leu fall; and drying up consumer credit would also have a chilling effect on the economy, much like raising interest rates would.

I think I myself would bite the bullet and let the leu fall, preferably while currency traders are distracted by something shiny elsewhere.

But I might be blinded by the beauty of David Hume's price-specie flow model. "Price levels are *supposed* to change in that situation!"

C.

Posted by: Carlos at December 11, 2003 06:51 AM

Guys - Doug is on a business trip in Budapest until Friday (lucky guy - uninterrupted sleep & sleeping in until 7 or so, plus an hour time difference -- oh, sweet heaven! He deserves it but I want it too...).

He'll be thrilled to read so many comments and will answer ASAP. (Who knows, he might check in from Hungary!)

Oops. Babies want attention. We're up since 5 am, btw. Urgh.

Claudia - sleepy

Posted by: claudia at December 11, 2003 06:58 AM

Wow, comments. Okay, some I'll answer here, some in another post (soon).

Anca/Misha, the statistics are questionable, yes. (I find it really hard to believe that a labor market as rigid as this one has unemployment below 7%.) Still, the fact that they've been going in one direction for a while is at least suggestive. If the real unemployment rate is twice the official rate, then the real unemployment rate has dropped from 17% to about 13% in the last year or so.

Also, remember what unemployment is measuring. It measures people who are looking for work but can't find it. It doesn't measure people who aren't looking for work, like students, housewifes, and the "discouraged" (people who have given up hope of finding a job.) It also doesn't measure people who say they want to work but never actually look.

Imports and exports... more about this in another post.

Where will growth come from, Randy? I don't know either, but there are some possibilities. Watch this space.

Carlos, don't forget what the toad beneath the harrow knows.

More in a bit.


Doug M.

Posted by: Doug at December 12, 2003 09:46 PM

Hi Doug.
I came across your site whilst reseaching information about Romania. I own a small business and was looking to expand and open up a business in Romania,recomended by a friend,. I'm having trouble in finding out workers wages and tax implication. Can you help me or give me a web site I can search.
Regard
Robert

Posted by: robert at January 31, 2004 07:19 AM